A  ·  A ·  A
Denise A. Agnew
Vivi Anna
Nina Bangs
L.A. Banks
Gail Barrett
Sherrill Bodine
Terri Brisbin
Jaci Burton
Dawn Calvert
Dianne Castell
Ann Christopher
Colleen Collins
Linda Conrad
Lauren Dane
Janelle Denison
Jamie Denton
Delilah Devlin
HelenKay Dimon
Barbara Dunlop
Leslie Esdaile Banks
Dara Girard
Dorie Graham
Susan Grant
Laura Griffin
Julia Harper
Elizabeth Hoyt
Myla Jackson
Lydia Joyce
Karen Kelley
Karen Kendall
Alison Kent
Jackie Kessler
Julie Leto
Shelley Munro
Sarah McCarty
Patrice Michelle
Liddy Midnight
Kathleen O'Reilly
Robin D. Owens
Carly Phillips
Tessa Radley
Joanne Rock
JoAnn Ross
Melissa Schroeder
Susan Stephens
Michele Scott
Tawny Taylor
Stephanie Tyler
Shiloh Walker
Tracy Anne Warren
Sasha White
Lauren Willig
On Sex

By Kathleen OReilly
August 26th, 2008

Follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

Leave a response or trackback from your own site.


I considered writing about politics, but I’m all politico-ed out this year. I thought about doing an RWA recap, but honestly, I wasn’t all tuned in at the conference, didn’t go to any sessions — I order the CD’s, so I can listen when my brain is actually functioning correctly. I thought about writing about all the books I’d been reading on my vacation — there were some great ones. Highly recommended: Water for Elephants by Sara Gruen and Irresistible by Susan Mallery. But instead, I decided to write about something completely different.

Sex in romance, sex in life.

First of all, to put all my cards on the table, I write for Harlequin Blaze. This means, I write sex in my books. A lot of sex. Most of the time, my characters have sex too early in their relationship and then have to deal with the consequences of diving head-first into a cement pool with no water.

People joke with me about writing sex, and sometimes it stings, sometimes it doesn’t, because people want to relegate sex to a private place, closed-door, no talking (unless you’re a guy in a locker room), or else they need to joke about. There are people who think that this attitude is an icky by-product of the American puritanical culture, but honestly, I think sex is meant to be a private thing, closed-door, not talking (especially if you’re a guy in a locker room). Perhaps that makes me an icky by-product of the American puritanical culture, I don’t know.

In the past decade, sex has been growingly used as a titillation device, to market paper towels and clothes (especially underwear). It used to be that sexy ads were targeted at men, but now, they’re targeted at woman as well (or possibly gay men, but honestly, I think it’s women). This bothers me, not because I’m an icky by-product of the American puritanical culture, but because sex is so much more complicated than paper towels and underwear, and by getting consumers adjusted to the idea of sex as oxytocin, dopamine, and serotonin pinging in the brain, we focus on the physical hormonal consequences, and forget the wonderful shades of emotional gray that come with sex.

Sex is power. God gave man physical strength, but he gave women sex, and to be frank, I think we got the better end of that deal. A lot of books ignore the inherit power of sex, but the give/take of a sexual relationship is huge and fraught with a courting dance that is a lot more interesting than lingering glances and a hand to the cheek.

In the airports now, they have a device that sees through clothes down to the bare naked person. If you’ve seen those pictures, they are frightening, not because you don’t want to see all these people naked, but in that two-dimensional picture, all the layers are gone, all the pretensions, all the designer labels, all the preppy intelligentsia have disappeared. Sex with another human being does that. It can be bad sex, it can be great sex, but it’s a great barrier-killer. Great sex can be an emotional commitment to a person, but bad sex can be a signal that either one or both parties isn’t there. When one person is having a great time, and the other is emotionally distant, it’s very sad. When two people are emotionally distant, it can break your heart.

There is a sexual journey for a couple, as well as the emotional journey. Some authors have their couples have fantastic sex 24/7, anytime, anyplace, no matter the emotional state of their relationship. Sometimes I buy this, but a lot of times, I like reading about the sexual journey as well. Within a relationship, sex is a viable bit of characterization, telling more about the emotional situation than four pages of internal narrative could ever provide.

There are a lot of reasons to put sex in a book. Titillation is one, yes, but that’s not nearly as rich as the others. So tell me, what do you think about the state of sex and romance? Does it bother you? Any examples of great stories that show a fascinating sexual journey?

Kathleen’s next release, Courting Disaster, will hit the shelves near the beginning of September. It’s a Silhouette Special Edition this time, part of the Thoroughbred Legacy series.

Courting Disaster


7 Responses to “On Sex”

  1. Patty L. Says:

    As a parent the over abundance of sex in our society is scary. I talk to my teen daughter about her place in the world and her sexual responsibilty, but televison makes sex so “common” that it’s hard to fight the importance of the act. LOL Did that make sense?

    I guess what I’m trying to say is sex is wonderful in the right context. I have no problem reading a Blaze with all of their heat, but I don’t want my kids exposed to it just yet. :wink:


  2. Kathleen OReilly Says:

    Patty,
    I agree with you about that. I have a 13 year old daughter, and a 9 year old son, and as a parent, I hate how they demean sex and make it into a butt for jokes or a marketing device. It’s a responsibility, best suited for someone with maturity. There’s a book, Female Chauvinist Pig (I think that’s the title) that talks about what the sexual culture has done to girls. Makes me very, very mad. But the relegating of females to sex objects (done willingly by the females themselves!) is another Blog topic entirely.


  3. Fedora Says:

    Interesting post, Kathleen–I agree with Patty. I love reading Blazes and other spicy titles, but I definitely think there are boundaries and I think I’d like in general for sex to be properly valued and not be cheapened by overexposure. It’s definitely one of the big parental responsibilities, I think, to help shape our kids’ ideas and values regarding sex. BTW, I just wanted to say that I’m looking forward to your Courting Disaster–the Thoroughbred Legacy series sounds really good!


  4. Kathleen OReilly Says:

    Fedora,

    I hope you enjoy the Legacy series and Courting Disaster. It was an interesting experience writing within the boundaries of an already plotted story, but I enjoyed it, and I loved my characters, so that’s something. :)

    I would like to see less sex within the world-view, the advertising, etc because I think we have reduced sex to a slot a, tab b mentality, and it’s like body-part humor, and I think that overlooks the rich emotional play that comes with sex.


  5. Penney Says:

    :mrgreen:
    Sounds like a great book! Thanks
    Penney


  6. Estella Says:

    I do not mind sex in books. The ads for men with erectile problems on tv are what make me mad. Any age child can watch those and I don’t think they should.
    I am looking forward to reading Courting Disaster.


  7. Kathleen OReilly Says:

    Oh, yes, the ED ads??? They are the worst. I used to think headache ads were bad when I was a kid, and now my children are listening to, “If you have an erection that lasts longer than four hours, consult a doctor.” You can’t even hide that.

    Sigh.